🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold move to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and parents are observing closely to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for other nations.

Across Europe Movement

Throughout Europe, a increasing group of nations are exploring parallel restrictions.

• The Danish government has announced a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the PM declaring that phones and networks are "stealing our kids' childhood". Legislation may be enacted soon.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is developing a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media users. The media minister have stated that an similar ban could be "an measures on the table".
• In Spain, the president has urged parliament to approve a law lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has recommended a related move, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The government in the Netherlands has recommended families to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has approved a non-binding motion demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is given. While it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the move does not create mandatory rules.

"An effective age limit is a solid foundation," stated one parliamentarian supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is discarded" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in strong data".

Earlier, momentum built behind a bill to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was in the end modified. Nonetheless, the government pledged to investigate the matter.

Charities have raised warnings. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after being exposed to harmful platform posts argues that a blanket age ban could fail to protect children and could result in a "dangerous transition" of risk when young people reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the inability of the Silicon Valley to build tools that are secure and fit for children," said a leading child protection advocate.

America: A State-by-State Approach

Across America, legislation is primarily occurring at the local level against a backdrop of national gridlock.

• Utah mandates parental consent for under-18s to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a law banning under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a regulation capping under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with additional access needing a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced bills requiring parental consent for minors to open social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from some politicians to copy the Australian path, a federal ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Outside of the West, other countries are similarly considering moves.

• The Malaysian government aims to restrict social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for one major platform to 16.

But, international organizations take a more measured position. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans have downsides and "might prove counterproductive". The body notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that government action should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to invest in user protection.

Even as this global conversation continues, the actions of this nation and its followers indicate that states around the world are increasingly prepared to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.